NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Joe Biden’s publicist simply introduced with a straight face that he plans to run once more in 2024. We’ll tackle that at some size tomorrow. However first, one other disaster within the information. So, after the killings in Buffalo and Uvalde just a few weeks in the past, you start to listen to individuals on tv discuss one thing known as pink flag legal guidelines. The federal government, they knowledgeable us, may really finish mass shootings tomorrow just by taking the weapons away from mass shooters earlier than they commit mass shootings. It is not difficult.
In reality, it is such an apparent resolution that you simply needed to marvel why we weren’t already doing that. Who does not need to stop mass shootings? Effectively, solely the gun foyer. All people else cares about kids. So, quite a lot of Individuals, not surprisingly, now say they need pink flag legal guidelines, and why would not they? Like supporting Black Lives Matter or combating local weather change or getting the COVID shot or standing with the courageous individuals of Ukraine. Crimson flag legal guidelines seem to be a type of concepts that no first rate individual may presumably oppose.
You need loopy individuals to have weapons? In fact, you do not. Who would? So naturally, you are for pink flag legal guidelines and in reality, we could quickly get pink flag walks throughout the nation. So, what would that imply if we do?
Effectively, two issues you must know. First: Crimson flag legal guidelines is not going to finish mass shootings, however pink flag legal guidelines will finish due course of. Due course of is an easy idea, but it surely’s the important thing to the whole lot that’s good about America.
In our system of justice, residents can’t be punished with out first being charged with against the law. Politicians can’t simply resolve to harm you, throw you in handcuffs, lock you in jail, seize your property just because they do not like the way you suppose or the way you vote. No. Earlier than they punish you, they should undergo a proper course of wherein they describe which particular legislation you broke and precisely the way you broke it. They should show it.
MSNBC HOST COMPARES GUNS TO SLAVERY: ‘LINCOLN WAS CRITICIZED FOR MOVING TOO SLOWLY’ TO ‘END SLAVERY’
For critical crimes with massive penalties, the federal government has to persuade a gaggle of your fellow residents first. It is known as a grand jury and this authorities should persuade them that you simply need to be punished or they can’t proceed. None of that is new. That is the way in which we have performed issues in America for greater than 200 years, and it is precisely why we have now and have all the time had the fairest justice system on the earth. Individuals transfer to this nation from everywhere in the globe to profit from it. However pink flag legal guidelines will finish this.
Below pink flag legal guidelines, the federal government does not should show you probably did something mistaken with the intention to strip you of your most elementary rights. All that is required to punish you is a criticism, presumably even an nameless criticism wherein someone says you appear harmful. Now, that criticism does not come from a grand jury. It will probably come from anybody, together with somebody who hates you or somebody who merely does not like your politics. It does not matter as a result of no jury will ever see it. On the idea of that unproven criticism, you lose your freedom and your capacity to defend your self and your loved ones.
Now, how may that presumably occur on this nation? Effectively, the Supreme Court docket has mentioned unequivocally that it could actually’t occur right here. A yr in the past, the Supreme Court docket dominated in a case known as Caniglia vs Strom. Police in Rhode Island had seized the non-public firearms of a 68-year-old man whose spouse had known as in a criticism towards him after they’d an argument. That man had dedicated no crime. He’d by no means been convicted of against the law, and he was judged by docs to be sane. And but the authorities took away his weapons anyway.
SEN. SCHUMER SAYS SENATE GUN SAFETY PACKAGE ‘DOESN’T HAVE EVERYTHING’ BUT IS ‘MOST SIGNIFICANT’ IN DECADES
He sued underneath the Fourth Modification and the case went all the way in which to the Supreme Court docket. The consequence was not even shut. The Supreme Court docket sided with the gun proprietor in that case in a uncommon nine-zero choice. That signifies that each justice, liberal and conservative, agreed that authorities can’t simply seize your property or throw you in jail as a result of they do not like the way in which you look or as a result of somebody is mad at you. So, pink flag legal guidelines are unconstitutional, interval. We needn’t guess about that. And but the Biden administration is pushing them anyway. Why? As a result of they do not care.
How is Joe Biden in a position to ignore a Supreme Court docket choice from final yr? Easy. He declares an emergency and does what he needs. He is performed it earlier than. The White Home did the identical factor with the eviction moratorium and vaccine mandates final yr. “It is an emergency. We do not have time for due course of!”
So, you possibly can see why Democrats love emergencies. Nothing provides them extra energy extra rapidly. They’ve declared the atrocities in Uvalde and Buffalo an emergency, in contrast to the day by day mass shootings in Baltimore and Chicago, cities they run and whose killings they subsequently assiduously ignore. And on the bottom of that emergency, they will transfer ahead with gun confiscation.
The White Home now needs Congress to move a legislation paying the states to enact pink flag legal guidelines. And here is the superb half: No less than ten Republican senators are backing this effort from the Biden White Home and which means that is nearly assured to move. What is the reasoning? Effectively, here is a type of senators, John Cornyn of Texas.
REP. MASSIE SAYS ‘GOOD GUYS’ WITH GUNS STOPPING ‘BAD GUYS’ IS ‘INCONVENIENT TRUTH’ FOR DEMS
REPORTER: You have got colleagues on the opposite, within the different chamber who’re already popping out towards this earlier than you even put out a proposal.
SEN. JOHN CORNYN: I am not shocked. Some individuals is not going to need to contact this with a ten-foot pole as a result of they’re involved concerning the politics of it, however I feel it is a time the place hopefully we will transcend that non-public political curiosity and do what we expect will save lives. To me, that is the final word purpose. We will do one thing wise that doesn’t undermine the rights of law-abiding residents underneath the Structure to maintain and bear arms.
So there are two issues to note about that soundbite, which is so revealing. The primary is the usage of the time period “wise.” Now that could be a Democratic speaking level permitted by the DNC. “It is wise gun security regulation.” So right here you may have John Cornyn taking Nancy Pelosi’s language and he is doing it on goal and you then hear him describe anybody who disagrees with him. Why would you disagree with John Cornyn? Effectively, based on John Cornyn, anybody who disagrees with them is “involved concerning the politics” of pink flag legal guidelines, not the knowledge of pink flag legal guidelines, not whether or not or not pink flag legal guidelines are constitutional, however the grubby politics.
SENATE REPUBLICANS WHO STRUCK DEAL WITH DEMS FOUGHT OFF PUSH TO RAISE ASSAULT WEAPONS PURCHASE AGE TO 21
In different phrases, says John Cornyn, anybody who disagrees with me is low and unethical.
Now, when you’re not used to listening to liberal demagoguery like that from Republicans, you must know that John Cornyn just isn’t the one one partaking in it. He’s joined on this effort by Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Rob Portman of Ohio, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Mitt Romney in fact of Utah, Invoice Cassidy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine, evidently, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina (all the time on board for any unhealthy concept) and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania.
Notably fascinating to see Lindsey Graham on board, the one that inspired Capitol Hill police to shoot extra Trump voters, who has no drawback with violence, whose life is organized round worshiping it, telling you that you may’t have a gun. Now, all of the senators whose names we simply learn, lots of whom are retiring so that they’re past the attain of voters, have the backing of the highest Republican within the Senate, Mitch McConnell.
So, what precisely are they backing once they again pink flag legal guidelines?
Effectively, we will take Florida’s expertise for example. In Florida, the police can seize weapons from individuals who pose a “important hazard” primarily based on “any related proof.” Huh? That is it, any related proof. The legislation raises some apparent questions, and the obvious is when you can seize individuals’s weapons with out proving that they dedicated against the law, why cannot you imprison them with out proving they dedicated against the law? If you happen to can take their weapons, why cannot you are taking their properties? Why cannot you empty their financial institution accounts? Oh, sound paranoid? Alex Jones stuff? That simply occurred in Canada.
FLORIDA BROTHERS, 11 AND 14, ARRESTED FOR STEALING GUNS, AMMO FROM GUN SHOP, POLICE SAY
What stops it from occurring right here? We already know the authorities are abusing the pink flag legal guidelines already on the books. Kendra Parris is a lawyer primarily based in Florida who focuses on them. In a latest interview, she mentioned shoppers are in a position to rent legal professionals, have “vastly larger” odds of getting their firearms again from the federal government.
In fact, legal guidelines like this all the time penalize the weakest. She mentioned courts are taking it “higher secure than sorry method” to keep away from political blowback and the police are benefiting from that. So, courtroom information present that cops in Florida usually present as much as the properties of residents who current them with “stipulations.” If you happen to agree in writing to give up your firearms, you may have an opportunity of getting them again after a yr. Now, because it occurs, that is a fairly tempting supply to supply when you may have armed individuals in your lounge. However it’s and it stays and once more, we needn’t guess about it as a result of the Supreme Court docket simply dominated on this, it is unconstitutional.
It’s for a number of causes. It is a clear violation of the search and seizure prohibition on the Fourth Modification, but it surely’s additionally utilized unfairly. And even the individuals who wrote our present pink flag legal guidelines admit that. In New York, for instance, Meeting member Jo Anne Simon co-sponsored the state’s pink flag legislation. “Mainly, it is in all places,” Simon admitted. “You have got locations the place we have now one filed, in different places the place it is 38 filed.”
FILMMAKER MICHAEL MOORE CONTINUES CALLS FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO BE REPEALED: ‘YOU DON’T NEED A GUN’
So, how will these legal guidelines be utilized? Effectively, in fact, they are going to be utilized alongside political strains, similar to the whole lot else at present is on this extremely politicized nation. So, when you don’t love somebody, when you don’t love what somebody believes, that individual will likely be a goal for unconstitutional search and seizure. Armed authorities displaying up in someone’s residence and taking their private property at gunpoint. And when you doubt that, that may occur, have a look at this.
That is the man, the exact same member of Congress who had intercourse with a Chinese language spy demanding that cops disarm Ben Shapiro as a result of Ben Shapiro says issues the Chinese language authorities disagrees with. That is from Eric Swalwell: “Please inform me this lunatic doesn’t personal a gun. Motive number one,578 that America wants pink flag legal guidelines.” Eric Swalwell wrote that.
Now what would qualify as a set off for gun seizure within the view of Eric Swalwell underneath the pink flag was that he helps and now Republicans within the Senate help? Effectively, here is the video that Ben Shapiro made that Swalwell thinks qualifies him for pink flag legislation. Watch.
BEN SHAPIRO: If you happen to come inform me that you’ll indoctrinate my children in a selected coverage and that I can not pull my child out of the college and ship my child to a college I need to ship them to, that I can not go to the church or synagogue that I need to go to, and when you make that nationwide coverage, not simply California coverage the place I can transfer, however nationwide coverage, persons are not going to face for that. I now have two decisions. One is to go away the nation completely. Two is to select up a gun. These are the one decisions that you’ve left me and now persons are on ” Oh that is, how may you say one thing like that? How may you be so excessive?” It is not excessive to defend the elemental rights the Structure was created with the intention to shield. These rights pre-exist authorities.
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAYS GUN TRAFFICKER PURCHASED MORE THAN 70 FIREARMS IN SIX MONTHS, SOME USED IN CRIMES
“These rights pre-exist authorities.” Effectively, really our founding paperwork make that time which he’s merely repeating, however on the idea of successfully quoting the founding paperwork of the nation we stay in, Eric Swalwell says the police ought to present up at Ben Shapiro’s home and take his firearms away. Does anyone, even Eric Swalwell, who’s deranged, sincerely consider that Ben Shapiro is a violent risk to anybody? No, in fact not. Ben Shapiro is an ideological risk and an ideological risk is the one sort of risk individuals like Eric Swalwell really care about and that if you have a look at the legal guidelines that they are pushing and that Republicans are backing.
If these legal guidelines have been really designed to combat gun crime, they might, amongst different issues, pressure prosecutors to implement present gun legal guidelines towards people who find themselves committing all of the murders and it is not Ben Shapiro. In Los Angeles and plenty of different cities, that is not occurring and that is why these criminals overtly help the Soros-backed prosecutor, George Gascon. Watch.
WILLIE WILKERSON, GANG MEMBER CHARGED WITH MURDER: I advised you final time he wanna hurry up and attempt to get one thing did earlier than they re-elect someone else in addition to Gascon and produce again that little, uh, b——- life with out parole and uh the demise penalty. If he may get the manslaughter, then s—.Manslaughter solely carries six, 9, 12.
NRA ENCOURAGES ‘REAL SOLUTIONS’ TO ‘STOP VIOLENCE’ AFTER SENATORS REACH BIPARTISAN GUN FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
Yeah. In order that’s only one tape. We will play you video, as we frequently do, of what is occurring in our metropolis. What you are taking a look at is anarchy, tyranny. People who find themselves favored by the regime can do no matter they need. You vote the precise manner, commit no matter crimes you need, in jail for 10 minutes, you are out, go do it once more, no drawback. Baltimore can occur, mass killings on an ongoing foundation for many years and nobody will say a phrase. However when you’re disfavored by the regime, no punishment is simply too robust, no infraction too small.
Not one of the gun laws that John Cornyn and all these different pompous buffoons who have been siding with Nancy Pelosi help, none of that laws would do something concerning the core drawback, which is DAs like George Gascon, who’re failing to implement present gun legal guidelines, gun legal guidelines that, by the way in which, George Gascon himself, to call one instance, is breaking.
A whistleblower in Gascon’s workplace says he was fired for complaining about Gascon’s behavior of illegally carrying firearms aboard airplanes. So, why have not the cops red-flagged George Gascon and disarmed him? Is anybody going to red-flag Hunter Biden, who lied on a federal drug kind, was a drug addict carrying a illegally obtained weapon? No, in fact not, as a result of pink flag legal guidelines aren’t designed to punish the politically loyal. And that is why you get scenes like this in New Orleans, which the police do nothing about.
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST: GUNS HARM CHILDREN MORE THAN CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, SO LET’S RESTRICT THEM
So hey, John Cornyn, will your laws do something about that? As a result of anyone who’s okay with that or what’s occurring in downtown Chicago or downtown Baltimore or Gary, Indiana or Detroit, simply choose a metropolis, day-after-day of the week – repair these issues and get again to me concerning the AR in my closet.
By the way in which in New Orleans, the Soros-backed DA there, Jason Williams is not fearful about what you simply noticed. Final yr, his workplace dismissed greater than 60% of violent felony circumstances that got here to his workplace, most of them involving firearms. So, they only dismissed him. These are the individuals fearful about gun crime. For perspective, the earlier administration dismissed solely 16% of these circumstances.
One other Soros-backed DA in Philadelphia has the same file. Within the first half of final yr, Larry Krasner’s workplace withdrew or dismissed 65% of all gun prices. Does that appear excessive? Effectively, it’s as a result of in 2015, that determine was simply 17%. New ideology, new consequence, and naturally, the end result is extra useless individuals. However this legislation does nothing about that. It ignores it utterly in favor of redefining you as a violent risk and giving the authorities managed by the Biden administration the precise to march into your own home with weapons drawn and disarm you.
So, what are they ignoring? Effectively, let’s have a look at. Final yr in Philadelphia, we set a file set for homicides. Already this yr, greater than 200 individuals have been shot to demise within the metropolis of Philadelphia, which isn’t an enormous metropolis, and it is getting smaller. On Friday, for instance, a 14-year-old boy was killed in a drive-by. On Saturday, a person was shot 5 occasions in West Philadelphia. Did you see that on the information? Most likely not.
MSNBC ANCHOR DEMANDS TO KNOW GOP ‘PLAN TO COMBAT INFLATION’ WHILE DEMOCRATS CONTROL WHITE HOUSE, CONGRESS
On Sunday evening, a person taking good care of his mom in North Philadelphia was shot behind the pinnacle. So, when you’re really fearful about gun crimes, gun atrocities (and for the file we’re as a result of in contrast to Lindsay Graham. We really hate violence) you’d do one thing about this and punish the people who find themselves committing gun crimes.
However no. They need to stop you from defending your loved ones, from shopping for or holding weapons. Why is that? Effectively, we needn’t guess as a result of they’re telling us. Watch what the legal professional normal of america, and simply to restate, this man really is the legal professional normal. He is greater than a craven political hack. He runs the DOJ. Watch him describe, Mr. Merrick Garland, the largest risk dealing with this nation right this moment.
MERRICK GARLAND, US ATTORNEY GENERAL: Within the FBI’s view, the highest home violent extremist risk comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, particularly those that advocated for the prevalence of the White race.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
That is only a whole lie, really, and we have now numbers to show it, however, , it is a lie. There is no justification rationally for what Merrick Garland simply mentioned. It is ridiculous. It is an apparent untruth and anybody residing in a serious metropolis is aware of that.
So, why do they preserve telling you that?
Effectively, as a result of nothing the Biden administration is doing and nothing that’s occurring in Congress proper now will really tackle gun violence. That is not the purpose, John Cornyn. The purpose is to permit the Democratic Occasion to turn out to be much more highly effective, and if it feels prefer it, to ship its armed brokers to raid the properties of Ben Shapiro and different disobedient individuals the Democratic Occasion does not like.