If handed, AB 1947, learn within the meeting Thursday, can be the primary state regulation to require regulation enforcement businesses to have hate crime insurance policies.
STOCKTON, Calif. — A invoice launched within the California state meeting Thursday goals to convey consistency to how regulation enforcement businesses within the state reply to and gather proof in circumstances of hate crimes.
Democrat Meeting member Phil Ting of San Francisco mentioned he launched AB-1947 after an increase was reported in hate crimes in opposition to the Asian American and Pacific Islander group within the final 12 months in the course of the pandemic.
The invoice would require all regulation enforcement businesses within the state to create hate crime insurance policies that embody protocols on how businesses acknowledge, report, and reply to hate crimes.
Legislation enforcement businesses can be required to file their insurance policies with the Division of Justice, which might submit info on compliance or non-compliance.
“That is about making certain that regulation enforcement can correctly determine a hate crime, that they’ll correctly categorize a hate crime,” Ting mentioned Friday. “By having that information, we’re truly going to proceed to see increasingly more reporting.”
A 2018 report from the state auditor discovered that hate crimes are underreported within the state by 14% due partly to non-existent or outdated regulation enforcement insurance policies concerning hate crimes.
“In the event you have a look at San Bernardino, you have a look at Riverside, enormous populations of individuals the place you see virtually no hate crimes reported in any respect,” Ting mentioned. “It is as a result of there actually is not sufficient coaching, there actually is not sufficient consideration paid to that exact difficulty.”
RELATED: Invoice defining hate crimes as violent felonies dies in California committee
Whereas no present regulation requires one, some regulation enforcement businesses within the state have already got hate crime insurance policies.
In accordance with the latest information from the Division of Justice, the Stockton Police Division, which handed a hate crime coverage in 2013, reported 4 hate crimes within the metropolis in 2019.
The Stockton Police Division’s hate crime coverage features a record of things for officers to make use of when figuring out whether or not an incident is a hate crime. Stockton Police’s coverage requires officers to inform instant supervisors and watch commanders of any hate crime or bias incident.
The Sacramento Police Division additionally has a coverage in relation to hate crimes. The division’s six-page coverage requires officers on scene of hate crimes to inform discipline supervisors.
The Division of Justice’s information reveals the Sacramento Police Division reported six hate crimes in 2019.
The Modesto Police Division, which the Division of Justice says reported three hate crimes in 2019, additionally has an current hate crime coverage.
Modesto Police’s coverage additionally requires officers to inform a supervisor when responding to hate crimes.
Ting mentioned he modeled the regulation after finding out the San Francisco Police Division’s hate crime coverage, which he says must be replicated across the state. The Fee on Peace Officer Requirements and Coaching (POST) can be in control of coaching new officers on easy methods to determine and deal with hate crimes.
“That is what we’re attempting to do for your entire remainder of the state in order that Asian People, and any People, do not need to worry strolling to the grocery retailer, doing their morning stroll for train, ready to catch a bus.” Ting mentioned.
Hearings on the invoice are anticipated to start in March 2022.
Watch Extra from ABC10: How will inflation influence your Tremendous Bowl social gathering get-together?